Incompetent Kader, demented Dave and breaking with Baggy: Reflections on a crazy day 3

Incompetent Kader and Demented Dave

I think I need therapy. As a long-time Davd Nalbandian fan you’d think I’d be used to him blowing matches he has no right to lose but it doesn’t get any easier.

That disgusting officiating played such a significant part in his marathon 6-4, 3-6, 6-2, 6-7 (5), 8-10 defeat John Isner makes it all the more difficult to swallow.

They say a good referee should be invisible but Kader Nouni was anything but with two horrific calls in the space of a minute at 8-8 and deuce in the fifth set.

The first was his decision to overrule a John Isner serve that was correctly called out by lines judge.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, he then refused to allow Nalbandian to refer his incompetence to Hawkeye, claiming that the player had taken too long to come to a decision.

From the initial call, twenty seconds passed until Nalbandian’s decision to challenge, but in the noise and confusion neither player was sure what had just happened and it was Isner who attempted to refer the call to Hawkeye first.

Following his conversation with Nouni to clarify what the call was and who had made it, Nalbandian inspected the mark and took eight seconds to challenge. Eight seconds.

Not an outrageous length of time by any means but after nearly five hours on court, surely within a reasonable timeframe.

By making himself the centre of attention, Nouni showed incompetence of the highest order and dealt a devastating blow to the Argentinean with the match on a knife-edge.

Nalbandian afterwards had the good grace to credit Isner rather than Nouni for the loss but he had already shown that he was entirely capable of grasping defeat from the jaws of victory all on his own.

He blew a break lead early in the second set, failed to capitalise on an early chance for a minibreak in the fourth set tiebreak but most importantly of all, squandered two glorious chances on virtual match points in that fateful 8-8 game.

What happened thereafter was entirely predictable, with the weight of the missed chances, scoreboard pressure and Isner’s huge returns taking their toll on Nalbandian as he was broken to lose a match he really had no right to lose.

John Isner: The Good the Bad and the Ugly

While last night’s match match showed us the best and worst of David Nalbandian, it also showed us both sides of John Isner.

Against similarly one-dimensional players, there’s nothing too out of the ordinary about the lanky yank’s game but against an artist like Nalbandian his limitations are harshly exposed.

It’s Stoke City against Barcelona, a Damien Hirst bovine carcass next to a Caravaggio, a Twilight novel against The Old Man and the Sea.

His tennis is ugly and there’s no getting away from it.

Unlike fellow giant Ivo Karlovic, Isner doesn’t even possess the saving aesthetic grace of a net game and when he beats a player like Nalbandian in such fashion it’s an awful result for the sport.

However, you can’t help but admire him for making the best of what he has got and his courage last night was phenomenal.

He played an almost-flawless tiebreak to stay in the match and once again, as his physical condition got worse, his serve just got better and better.

He also deserves credit for respecting the cramp rule rather than passing it off as a muscular “injury” and seeking medical treatment – as is practically the norm nowadays.

John Isner: Great guy, grotesque game.

Mardy the Moody Mug

Mardy Fish getting a bee in his bonnet about opponents supposedly abusing medical time out rules is hardly anything new.

In the midst of one such tantrum against Paul-Henri Mathieu he remarked that he lost an Olympic gold medal because someone ( Nicolas Massu) “took a twenty fuckin’ minute bathroom break then called the trainer again.”

He also went on to say, “It’s bullshit. They do it all the time.”

Now just who “they” are in Mardy’s mind is anyone’s guess but he certainly seems to have a chip on his shoulder when it comes to time out rules.

In his straight set defeat to Alejandro Falla, Fish objected to the Colombian receiving treatment for what he perceived as cramp and he wasn’t shy about letting the umpire know about it.

The problem for Fish is that when his anger levels rise, his level of play drops proportionately.

He’s never been able to use his boorish outbursts as motivation and as a veteran on tour you’d think he would have learned his lesson by now.

Think of his other most recent tantrums – against Grigor Dimitrov at the Hopman Cup and at the US Open last year against Jo Wilfried Tsonga. When he loses his temper, he loses the match. And makes himself look like a classless idiot in the process.

Such immaturity in a guy his age is inexcusable and it’s about time he grew up.

Breaking with Baggy

I didn’t see the match but this is spectacular. Completely batshit insane, but spectacular nonetheless.

This entry was posted in Features and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Incompetent Kader, demented Dave and breaking with Baggy: Reflections on a crazy day 3

  1. As a fellow Nalbandian fan, I share your pain. I was at MCA for the start of this one, but had to leave. I’m both sad and glad I did.

  2. GM says:

    C’mon mate.

    1 – You can’t look at the mark before making a challenge. I know most umpires let players do this (a complete joke) but that doesn’t justify anything.
    2 – We understand you like Nalbandian and all but if he were so much better than Isner, he’d win easily, especially in such slow conditions – conditions that played right into Nalbandian’s game. He’s a good player but for the amount of hype he attracts, his serve is way below average and his forehand is shaky at crucial points.
    3 – Isner’s game isn’t any uglier than Nadull’s or Fakervic’s or Murray’s forehand, for that matter. He’s just a very mentally apt guy for this sport.
    4 – Why is Fish being immature if he’s just complaining about the rules not being enforced. Not everybody is JMac, a guy who manages to play better and better the more annoyed he gets. I don’t think it has to do with maturity and my opinion is that the classless are the ones pulling fake injuries to win matches.

  3. the golden shamrock says:

    baggy showing us how you do it

    good man that baggy good teacher too

  4. Steve says:

    Cheers for the comment Gu. Nice to have a bit of debate.

    1. The rules are unclear. He took eight seconds. Why intervene on such a massive point? I would agree with you about checking marks if the rules were enforced in a consistent manner but 8-8 deuce isn’t the time for laying down strict interpretations.
    2 – 3. He’s obviously not better as such, just my opinion that he’s much better to watch. I agree the other players you mentioned have some pretty ugly aspects to their game (though apart from Rafa, not as bad as Isner) but that’s the way tennis is going. Players with touch and feel are a dying breed and I think it’s sad to see them lose like this. Although you’ve never liked him, Nalbandian is one of those players. It’s nothing personal about Isner, as you can see from my praise of him.
    4. Fish is being immature because he lets his paranoid complaining affect his level. Did you see how bad he was yesterday? Ridiculous. By this stage of his career he should be able to remain calm in those situations. Maturity is focusing on your own game rather than worrying if your opponent is injured or cramping or trying to cheat or whatever.

  5. GM says:

    Well, the rules are clear when they say you can’t check the mark before making a challenge.

    Nalbandian surely is a gifted player, but he’s hyped as something extraordinary. He belongs in a category with guys like Gonzalez, Rios and Philippoussis (except his game is probably more complete than Gonzalez’s or Philippoussis’) – guys who made it to the top 10, won some big tournaments (ok, Gonzalez hasn’t won a Masters, but he would’ve in a world without Nadull), had a few great wins, a slam final but haven’t actually won them. All these guys had deficiencies in their games – Scud had poor movement, Gonzo no backhand, Rios no serve, Fat Dave has no serve as well and his fitness is questionable at best. That’s all. He’s in the twilight of his career and Isner having such an advantage in a crucial area of the game made that win actually very predictable.

    Is Fish immature throwing tantrums because he’s now a top 10 player? Obviously. Is he wrong calling out on the fake timeouts? No, he’s not. His main mistake is complaining to the umpire like a girl instead of actually confronting the other guy. Call him out on his bullshit and make the guy feel the pressure. Nonetheless, I still feel he’s taking the right attitude. Fake timeouts are one of the cancers of this sport nowadays, together with lax anti-doping regulations and the absurd favouring of top players.

    Love your work, keep it up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s